Originally published Senate bill calls for tighter reserve component inclusion in cyber mission force on by https://defensescoop.com/2025/07/16/senate-fy26-ndaa-bill-reserve-component-inclusion-cyber-mission-force/ at DefenseScoop
The Senate Armed Services Committee’s version of the fiscal 2026 National Defense Authorization Act calls for a report to examine how DOD can improve inclusion of reserve forces in the cyber mission force.
Listen to this article
0:00
Learn more.
This feature uses an automated voice, which may result in occasional errors in pronunciation, tone, or sentiment.

The Senate Armed Services Committee wants a plan for how the Department of Defense can integrate reserve components into its active cyber forces.
The language appears in the SASC-passed version of the annual defense policy bill for fiscal 2026. While the committee approved the legislation last week, the full text was only released Wednesday.
Specifically, if it becomes law, the legislation would require a report from the Pentagon on the integration of reserve components, namely the National Guard, into the cyber mission force. It would also mandate an implementation plan.
The cyber mission force is comprised of 147 teams — including offensive, defensive and support teams — that the military services provide to U.S. Cyber Command to employ for operations.
Guard units have been used to support or supplement active units in various capacities. In fact, at the outset and creation of the cyber mission force nearly 15 years ago, the Air Force decided to initially take a total force approach to build its contribution, meaning its teams were made up of a mix of active component and Guard members.
Other assistance, most notably, includes Task Force Echo, the biggest Guard cyber mobilization to date with soldiers from 32 states having supported it over a number of years.
Little public information is known about the task force other than it aids full-spectrum cyber operations for Cybercom’s Cyber National Mission Force. While not so-called “trigger pullers,” sources have also indicated the task force provides infrastructure support.
The Guard has also conducted experiments with Cybercom in years past to test what was called the Cyber 9-Line, a tool that allows participating Guard units from their respective states to quickly share incidents with the Cyber National Mission Force, which can provide analysis of discovered malware and offer feedback to the states to help redress the incident, while also potentially taking action against the threat outside U.S. borders.
The Senate Armed Services Committee’s fiscal 2026 policy bill would require a report that provides an assessment of different authorities in each status of the reserve components, with particular focus on the National Guard and authorities under title 32, and how the DOD can use those personnel in such statuses within the cyber mission force.
It should also include an analysis of current and planned efforts to work with the military departments, the National Guard and the adjutants general of each state to develop unique cyber capabilities that address identified operational requirements — and a description of methods to work with those entities to track and identify key skills and competencies that aren’t part of primary military occupational specialties.
Moreover, senators want to see an evaluation of what types of authorities would be most beneficial to maximize the activation and support of the reserve components to cyber operations as well as an evaluation of the existing barriers to or impediments for integration of the reserve components into the cyber mission force.
The Guard has been lauded as an under-tapped and potentially vital resource for the nation in cyberspace. Many of its members work in cybersecurity as their full-time jobs when they’re not in uniform, meaning they oftentimes possess unique skills not always found in the active component.
There have been big pushes in recent years to more tightly integrate these Guard and Reserve forces into the larger DOD cyber enterprise to be able to act as surge capability in the event of a major cyber incident against the nation.
Legislation has also been introduced previously to help clear hurdles — real or perceived — to allow the Guard to respond to cyber threats.
Latest Podcasts
Originally published DefenseScoop